Many funds and regulated entities operate under strict investment mandates, which dictate the types of assets they can and cannot purchase. These rules help investors understand the risks involved—for example, an equity fund won’t suddenly invest in sovereign debt, and a long-only fund will never take short positions.
Such mandates, while prudent, often prevent large pools of capital from flowing into emerging or alternative assets—including Bitcoin. Even when fund managers believe in Bitcoin’s potential, regulatory and policy barriers may stop them from buying it directly.
This is where companies like MicroStrategy come into play.
How Did MicroStrategy Acquire So Much Bitcoin?
Broadly speaking, MicroStrategy used three primary methods to fund its Bitcoin acquisitions: operational revenue, equity sales, and debt financing. Among these, the sale of stock has been the most significant source of capital.
It might seem counterintuitive: why would investors buy MicroStrategy stock instead of purchasing Bitcoin directly? The answer lies in a concept often celebrated in the world of finance: arbitrage.
Why Choose $MSTR Over Direct $BTC Exposure?
Many institutional players—such as mutual funds, insurance companies, and certain trusts—are restricted from holding commodities or ETFs. Since Bitcoin is often classified as a commodity in the U.S., these entities are effectively blocked from gaining direct exposure.
Before Bitcoin ETFs were available, MicroStrategy offered one of the few credible ways for equity-only funds to gain indirect Bitcoin exposure. As a publicly traded company, it was permitted to buy and hold Bitcoin, making its stock a valuable proxy asset.
This created consistent demand for $MSTR shares, often trading at a premium compared to the underlying Bitcoin value per share. MicroStrategy repeatedly leveraged this premium to issue more shares, raise capital, and buy more Bitcoin—effectively increasing its Bitcoin holdings per share over time.
In the past two years, holding $MSTR would have yielded a Bitcoin-denominated return of 134%—one of the highest scalable returns available in the market.
This is a classic case of "mandate arbitrage." Even after the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs, many funds—including mutual funds managing trillions in assets—are still not allowed to invest in ETFs. For them, MicroStrategy remains a viable alternative.
A relevant case is Capital Group’s Capital International Investors Fund (CII), which manages over $500 billion but is restricted to equities. Unable to buy Bitcoin or Bitcoin ETFs, CII turned to MicroStrategy and now owns approximately 12% of the company’s shares, making it one of the largest non-insider shareholders.
👉 Explore investment strategies
Debt Structure: A Strategic Advantage
Not all debt is created equal. While high-interest unsecured debt (like credit card debt) can be risky, corporate debt backed by assets can be far more manageable—similar to a mortgage.
MicroStrategy’s debt is structured to allow interest-only payments for extended periods, with the principal due at maturity. As long as the company continues to service its debt, lenders have no right to liquidate its Bitcoin holdings.
This approach offers flexibility and helps the company weather Bitcoin’s notorious volatility. That said, it is not without risk. Should interest rates rise significantly or Bitcoin’s price fall dramatically, debt servicing could become challenging.
However, under current conditions, Bitcoin would need to drop to around $15,000 per coin within the next five years to threaten MicroStrategy’s solvency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is mandate arbitrage?
Mandate arbitrage occurs when investors use legally permissible assets—such as publicly traded stocks—to gain exposure to otherwise restricted investments like Bitcoin. MicroStrategy’s stock serves as a bridge for equity-only funds to access crypto markets.
Why do some funds prefer $MSTR over a Bitcoin ETF?
Many mutual funds and institutional investors are prohibited from holding commodities or ETFs. Since Bitcoin is often deemed a commodity, these entities turn to equity-based vehicles like MicroStrategy for compliant exposure.
Is MicroStrategy’s debt risky?
While all debt carries risk, MicroStrategy’s loans are structured with long maturity dates and interest-only periods. This reduces immediate liquidity pressure. However, a prolonged Bitcoin bear market could increase financial strain.
Can other companies replicate this model?
Yes. Several firms—often called "treasury companies"—are adopting similar strategies. However, if competition increases and share premiums decline, excessive debt accumulation could become a sector-wide risk.
What happens if Bitcoin’s price falls significantly?
MicroStrategy’s debt covenants do not include margin-call triggers based on Bitcoin’s price. The company would need to continue paying interest, but lenders cannot force Bitcoin sales unless the company defaults.
How does MicroStrategy decide when to buy more Bitcoin?
The company often times its purchases using proceeds from equity sales or debt issuance, particularly when its stock is trading at a premium to its Bitcoin holdings.
Conclusion
MicroStrategy is not merely a leveraged Bitcoin buyer. It is a company built on arbitrage—exploiting regulatory gaps and market inefficiencies to deliver Bitcoin exposure to investors who otherwise couldn’t access it.
While debt remains part of its strategy, the company’s careful structure and persistent premium have allowed it to accumulate Bitcoin at a monumental scale. As more firms emulate this model, the landscape may evolve—but for now, MicroStrategy remains a unique and influential player in the Bitcoin ecosystem.