MetaMask and Phantom are two of the most popular browser extension wallets in the crypto space. If you're having a hard time deciding between them, you're not alone.
This article compares both wallets to help you determine which one is better suited to your needs. We'll evaluate their core features, usability, security, and overall performance to help you make an informed choice.
Overview of MetaMask
MetaMask is a browser extension wallet primarily built for interacting with the Ethereum blockchain. It has gained massive popularity over the years, especially with the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized exchanges (DEXs).
You can use MetaMask to buy, sell, swap, send, receive, and store Ethereum-based tokens. It also supports interactions with decentralized applications (DApps) and lets users buy and sell NFTs on Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
If you're new to MetaMask, it's essential to understand its core functions and how to get started.
Overview of Phantom
Phantom is a browser-based cryptocurrency wallet designed specifically for the Solana blockchain. It allows users to interact with Solana DApps, smart contracts, and tokens seamlessly.
Phantom is a dedicated Solana wallet and currently supports only Solana-based assets. It is available on major browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Brave, and Edge. Phantom also offers a mobile app, allowing users to sync their wallets across devices for a unified experience.
The wallet boasts a user-friendly interface, making it easy even for beginners to navigate the Solana ecosystem. By simply connecting the wallet to a supported website—such as a DEX or NFT marketplace—users can start transacting immediately.
User Interface Comparison
| Feature | MetaMask | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Simple and minimalistic | Modern and intuitive |
| Layout | 3 sections | 4 sections |
| Information | Balance, tokens, active network | Balance, tokens, network, transactions, and menu |
| Usability | Easier for beginners | Feature-rich but slightly complex |
MetaMask Interface
MetaMask features a clean and minimalistic design. The interface is divided into three main sections:
- The top section displays wallet information such as balance, supported tokens, and the connected network.
- The middle section lists the tokens held by the user.
- The bottom section shows a history of recent transactions.
Setting up MetaMask is straightforward. After installing the extension, users create a password to secure the wallet. There are no KYC (Know Your Customer) or AML (Anti-Money Laundering) requirements.
The main dashboard provides easy access to send and receive functions. Transactions are conducted using Ethereum (ETH), and users can conveniently track their token portfolio.
Phantom Interface
Phantom offers a more modern and visually intuitive interface. The layout includes four key sections:
- The top section shows the wallet balance, supported tokens, and active network.
- The middle section displays the user’s tokens, grouped by network.
- The lower section provides a transaction history, organized by time.
- The side menu offers quick access to features like DeFi platforms and NFT galleries.
Phantom simplifies the Solana experience with its user-friendly design. After installation, users only need a password to access the wallet—no complicated KYC steps. The dashboard includes clear options for sending and receiving funds. Transactions are executed using SOL tokens, and users can easily explore their token holdings or built-in Dex tools.
Supported Blockchains
A significant difference between MetaMask and Phantom lies in blockchain compatibility.
Phantom is exclusive to the Solana ecosystem. It supports only Solana-based tokens, DApps, NFTs, and smart contracts.
MetaMask, on the other hand, was originally designed for Ethereum but has expanded to support other Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatible networks, including Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, and Avalanche. Users can easily switch between these networks within the wallet.
This multi-chain support makes MetaMask more versatile for users engaged with various blockchains.
Fee Structure
Transaction fees are a critical consideration for crypto users. Here’s how both wallets compare:
MetaMask uses Ethereum gas fees to verify transactions. These fees fluctuate based on network congestion and can sometimes be very high. Additionally, MetaMask may charge extra for certain actions, such as NFT purchases.
Phantom uses Solana’s gas fees, which are significantly lower due to the network’s high throughput and scalability. This makes Phantom a more affordable option for frequent transactions.
| Fee Type | MetaMask | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Wallet Creation | Free | Free |
| Wallet Usage | Free | Free |
| Transfer Between Wallets | From $0.05 | From $0.0001 |
| NFT Purchase | From $2 | From $0.01 |
| Token Staking | From $0.01 | From $0.0001 |
Available Features
Both wallets offer a robust set of features tailored to enhance the user experience:
- Swapping: MetaMask integrates with DeFi platforms like Uniswap and Sushiswap, while Phantom uses Jupiter Aggregator for token swaps. MetaMask charges a 0.875% swap fee, compared to Phantom’s 0.85%.
- Staking: MetaMask allows staking via Lido Finance and Rocket Pool. Phantom supports native SOL staking directly within the wallet.
- NFTs: Both wallets support NFT storage and display. Phantom offers a dedicated gallery view, while MetaMask allows users to view NFTs in a portfolio layout.
Hardware Wallet Support
Security-conscious users often prefer hardware wallets for storing crypto assets. MetaMask supports a wide range of hardware wallets, including Trezor, Ledger, Lattice, Keystone, and AirGap Vault.
Phantom, by contrast, currently supports only Ledger devices. This makes MetaMask the better choice for users seeking flexibility in hardware wallet options.
Ease of Use
Usability is a key factor, especially for newcomers:
Phantom’s single-blockchain focus results in a simpler, more streamlined user experience. Its interface is intuitive, with all essential functions accessible from the main screen.
MetaMask supports multiple blockchains, which requires users to switch networks manually. This can be confusing for beginners. However, its layout is still relatively straightforward, and many users appreciate the added functionality.
For pure simplicity, Phantom has a slight edge.
Security Comparison
Security is paramount in the crypto world. Both wallets take user safety seriously:
- Neither wallet requires personal information for setup.
- Each uses a password and a secret recovery phrase (12–24 words) for account access and restoration.
- MetaMask requires users to confirm their recovery phrase during setup, reducing the risk of improper backup.
- Phantom allows users to delay this step, which could lead to security risks if the phrase is not stored safely.
Overall, both are secure, but MetaMask’s mandatory backup process gives it a slight advantage.
👉 Explore secure wallet strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
Which wallet is better for beginners?
Phantom is often easier for beginners due to its intuitive design and lower transaction fees. However, MetaMask is also user-friendly and supports more blockchains, offering greater long-term flexibility.
Can I use both wallets at the same time?
Yes, you can install both MetaMask and Phantom simultaneously. They operate independently and are suited for different blockchains—Ethereum/EVM chains and Solana, respectively.
Are these wallets free to use?
Both wallets are free to download and use. However, transaction fees (gas fees) apply when conducting transfers, swaps, or other on-chain activities.
Can I stake cryptocurrencies using these wallets?
Yes. MetaMask supports staking through integrated protocols like Lido, while Phantom allows direct staking of SOL tokens.
Is it safe to connect these wallets to DApps?
Both wallets are designed to connect securely to decentralized applications. Always ensure you are interacting with verified and trusted DApps to minimize risks.
Which wallet has better customer support?
Both wallets offer support through documentation, FAQs, and community forums. Neither provides live customer service, so users rely on self-help resources.
Conclusion
Your choice between MetaMask and Phantom ultimately depends on your preferred blockchain and usage needs:
- Choose MetaMask if you operate primarily on Ethereum or other EVM-compatible chains, value multi-chain functionality, or prioritize hardware wallet compatibility.
- Choose Phantom if you are focused on Solana, want lower transaction costs, and prefer a simpler user interface.
Both wallets offer strong security, essential DeFi features, and support for NFTs. Your decision should align with your crypto goals and the ecosystems you plan to explore.