Money is fundamentally a social phenomenon. As noted by British monetary economist Laurence Harris, different types of money exist within different social and economic structures. The German philosopher Georg Simmel elegantly illustrated how money, as a universal equivalent, transforms complex barter relationships into value-based interactions. This process reduces path dependency in economic relations and enhances social dynamism.
The limitations of physical carriers like metal and paper have pushed money toward dematerialization. The emergence of digital money—account-based entries without physical form—represents the final step in this evolution. Once virtualized, money becomes subject to political consensus and control. The monopolization of money issuance by states and central banks reflects this political dimension.
Today, digital currencies represent a new frontier in monetary evolution. They challenge existing systems and propose alternative mechanisms for exchange, storage, and credit. Yet, their development remains tightly interwoven with economic needs and political realities.
Understanding the Nature of Money
Money serves both economic and political functions. Its evolution has moved from decentralized commodity-based systems to centralized state-controlled mechanisms.
Economic Functions of Money
From an economic standpoint, money facilitates exchange, storage, and credit allocation. Using a monetary asset portfolio framework, we can break down these functions into hierarchical roles:
- Medium of Exchange: Money acts as a transaction facilitator and settlement foundation. The stock of money represents its asset attribute, influenced by individual portfolio preferences. The flow of money reflects transactional activity and the desire to reconfigure asset holdings.
- Store of Value: Metal coins and other durable forms of money allow individuals to preserve wealth across time, addressing temporal mismatches between income and expenditure.
- Credit Instrument: With the advent of social credit, money enables borrowing and lending, allowing economic agents to reconfigure assets and liabilities across time and space.
In modern economies, commercial and central banking systems enable money creation beyond metal reserves or tangible assets. This “fiat” dimension introduces a virtual aspect to money, where newly created money represents future debt obligations at a societal level.
Political Dimensions of Money
Politically, money has evolved from tribal commodity money to state-minted coins, then to state-backed paper currency, and finally to central bank-managed digital entries. Sovereign money inherently unites monetary and fiscal policies—currency issuance draws legitimacy from public trust and tax revenue support.
Monetary efficiency and credibility contribute to economic stability when managed well. However, the infinite expandability of fiat money under Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), coupled with excessive government spending, can lead to collusion between political and economic interests—resulting in inflation or financial instability.
Three monetary functions are deeply tied to state authority:
- The payment function relies on stable markets and sound public governance.
- The credit function requires a lawful society, trustworthy institutions, and economic order.
- The redundancy function (money creation) reflects the rationality of government and its creditworthiness. Moderate fiscal deficits and low sovereign bond rates are normal tools for economic stabilization.
Digital Currency: Innovations and Limitations
Digital currencies aim to create improved transaction media and stable store-of-value assets. They seek to mitigate inflation and deflation cycles, enhance privacy and security, and modernize monetary systems using digital technology.
However, these initiatives must also navigate complex economic organizations, social structures, and regulatory boundaries. The convergence of digital currency, digital economy, and fintech could reshape payment systems, credit creation mechanisms, and financial supervision.
Libra: A Private Stablecoin Initiative
Libra (now Diem) was an early attempt at a corporate-backed digital currency. Proposed as a stablecoin backed by a basket of sovereign currencies, it aimed to enable smoother cross-border transactions and price stability.
However, it raised several monetary policy questions:
- How to prevent competing digital currencies from leading to monetary chaos?
- How to address potential derivative deposits and money multiplier effects?
- How to maintain sufficient real-asset reserves as the system scales?
- How to manage interactions with sovereign monetary systems?
- How to comply with cross-border capital controls and anti-money laundering regulations?
These issues reveal inherent tensions between global private currencies and national economic sovereignty.
eSDR: A Digital Version of Special Drawing Rights?
The eSDR concept proposes a digital SDR backed by blockchain and algorithmic issuance. It would anchor value to global economic growth and inflation levels, operating through decentralized nodes and international agreements.
Yet critical questions remain:
- Who issues or manages the eSDR?
- How would it coexist with sovereign currencies?
- How would it affect national monetary policies?
Without clear institutional backing or international political agreement, eSDR remains a theoretical construct rather than a practical solution.
👉 Explore digital currency frameworks
Sovereign Digital Currencies: Rscoin and DCEP
Some countries are exploring state-backed digital currencies. Examples include the UK’s Rscoin and China’s DCEP. These systems often adopt a two-tier model:
- The central bank issues digital currency替代纸币 (replacing cash in M0).
- Commercial banks distribute it and maintain customer interfaces.
Such sovereign digital currencies function as legal tender with full liquidity and state backing. Benefits include:
- Digital record-keeping improves anti-money laundering oversight.
- Enables negative interest rate policies by eliminating physical cash.
- Reduces printing, minting, and storage costs.
Most designs currently avoid disrupting existing monetary policy or credit intermediation roles of commercial banks. If fully implemented, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could lead to 100% reserve banking—a throwback to Irving Fisher and Milton Friedman’s proposals for monetary stability.
The Future of Money: Technology and Politics
Current digital currency proposals differ mainly in their stance on centralization. Private and supranational models promote decentralization and technological solutions but often overlook monetary essence—the interplay between payment safety and issuance credibility.
Money is more than a payment tool; it is a core component of asset allocation, social credit, and economic capitalization. Its political nature ensures that it remains tied to state sovereignty.
International cooperation on money is notoriously difficult. The Eurozone’s struggles with fiscal coordination and economic imbalance illustrate how hard it is to align divergent national interests. Most nations guard monetary sovereignty jealously.
An ideal future “absolute currency” might function as a numéraire—a pricing benchmark based on a globally representative basket of goods and services. Powered by big data and real-time computation, it could index relative prices and avoid inflation by design.
But such a system would require unprecedented global political coordination and technical precision. Questions around reserve requirements, payment infrastructure, credit constraints, and monetary policy remain open.
For now, most CBDC projects are cautious upgrades—digitizing cash and improving cross-border payments without challenging monetary sovereignty or existing policy frameworks.
The road to monetary innovation is filled with creative ideas but also deep misunderstandings. Official and public perceptions of money’s nature, history, and potential vary widely. The search for better money continues.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fundamental nature of money?
Money serves as a medium of exchange, store of value, and unit of account. It evolves from societal consensus and state authority, blending economic utility with political legitimacy.
How do digital currencies differ from traditional money?
Digital currencies exist purely in electronic form and often leverage blockchain or distributed ledger technology. They aim to improve transaction efficiency, privacy, and cross-border functionality.
Can digital currencies replace sovereign money?
Most proposals for non-sovereign digital currencies face significant political and economic obstacles. Sovereign states are unlikely to cede monetary control to private or supranational entities.
What are the benefits of central bank digital currencies?
CBDCs can enhance payment efficiency, strengthen monetary policy transmission, reduce physical cash costs, and improve financial inclusion and oversight.
What is stopping global adoption of a universal digital currency?
Political sovereignty, economic divergence, regulatory differences, and varying levels of technological readiness are major barriers to a universal digital currency.
Are digital currencies secure?
While many digital currencies use advanced cryptography, they are not immune to hacking, fraud, or system failure. Security levels depend on design, governance, and operational controls.